|  icing conditions in flight
 
       “When ice is encountered, immediately start working to get out of it. 
       Unless the condition is freezing rain, or freezing drizzle, it rarely 
       requires fast action and certainly never panic action, but it does call 
       for positive action.” 
      Why Ice Is Bad
 Ice in flight is bad news. It destroys the smooth flow of air, increasing 
      drag while decreasing the ability of the airfoil to create lift. The 
      actual weight of the ice on the airplane is insignificant when compared to 
      the airflow disruption it causes. As power is added to compensate for the 
      additional drag and the nose is lifted to maintain altitude, the angle of 
      attack is increased, allowing the underside of the wings and fuselage to 
      accumulate additional ice. Ice accumulates on every exposed frontal 
      surface of the airplane—not just on the wings, propeller, and windshield, 
      but also on the antennas, vents, intakes, and cowlings. It builds in 
      flight where no heat or boots can reach it. It can cause antennas to 
      vibrate so severely that they break. In moderate to severe conditions, a 
      light aircraft can become so iced up that continued flight is impossible. 
      The airplane may stall at much higher speeds and lower angles of attack 
      than normal. It can roll or pitch uncontrollably, and recovery may be 
      impossible. Ice can also cause engine stoppage by either icing up the 
      carburettor or, in the case of a fuel-injected engine, blocking the 
      engine's air source.
 
       
      Kinds of Ice and Their Effects on Flight
 Structural ice is the stuff that sticks to the outside of the airplane. It 
      is described as rime, clear (sometimes called glaze), or mixed.
 
       
       Rime ice has a rough, 
       milky white appearance, and generally follows the contours of the surface 
       closely. Much of it can be removed by deice systems or prevented by 
       anti-ice.
      Clear (or glaze) ice is 
      sometimes clear and smooth, but usually contains some air pockets that 
      result in a lumpy translucent appearance. The larger the accretion, the 
      less glaze ice conforms to the shape of the wing; the shape is often 
      characterized by the presence of upper and lower “horns.” Clear ice is 
      denser, harder, and sometimes more transparent than rime ice, and is 
      generally hard to break. 
      Mixed ice is a combination 
      of rime and clear ice.  
     Ice can distort the flow of 
    air over the wing, diminishing the wing's maximum lift, reducing the angle 
    of attack for maximum lift, adversely affecting airplane handling qualities, 
    and significantly increasing drag. Wind tunnel and flight tests have shown 
    that frost, snow, and ice accumulations (on the leading edge or upper 
    surface of the wing) no thicker or rougher than a piece of coarse sandpaper 
    can reduce lift by 30 percent and increase drag up to 40 percent. Larger 
    accretions can reduce lift even more and can increase drag by 80 percent or 
    more.  Even aircraft equipped for 
    flight into icing conditions are significantly affected by ice accumulation 
    on the unprotected areas. A NASA study (NASA TM83564) showed that close to 
    30 percent of the total drag associated with an ice encounter remained after 
    all the protected surfaces were cleared. Nonprotected surfaces may include 
    antennas, flap hinges, control horns, fuselage frontal area, windshield 
    wipers, wing struts, fixed landing gear, etc. Some unwary pilots have, 
    unfortunately, been caught by surprise with a heavy coating of ice and no 
    plan of action. Many pilots get a weather briefing and have little or no 
    idea how to determine where icing may occur. However, pilots can learn 
    enough basic meteorology to understand where ice will probably be waiting 
    after they get their weather briefing.  The pilot can then formulate 
    an ice- voidance flight plan before ever leaving the ground. Ice can form on 
    aircraft surfaces at 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit) or colder 
    when liquid water is present. Even the best plans have some variables. 
    Although it is fairly easy to predict where the large areas of icing 
    potential exist, the accurate prediction of specific icing areas and 
    altitudes poses more of a quandary. Mountains, bodies of water, wind, 
    temperature, moisture, and atmospheric pressure all play ever-changing roles 
    in weather-making.  All clouds are not alike. 
    There are dry clouds and wet clouds. Dry clouds have relatively little 
    moisture and, as a result, the potential for aircraft icing is low. North 
    Dakota, because of its very cold winters, is often home to dry clouds. 
    However, winter in the Appalachians in Pennsylvania and New York often 
    brings a tremendous amount of moisture with the cold air and lots of wet 
    clouds that, when temperatures are freezing or below, are loaded with ice. 
    The Great Lakes are a great moisture source. The origin of a cold air mass 
    is a key to how much supercooled water the clouds will carry. If the 
    prevailing winds carry clouds over water, they will probably be wet. Fronts and low-pressure 
    areas are the biggest ice producers, but isolated air mass instability with 
    plenty of moisture can generate enough ice in clouds to make light aircraft 
    flight inadvisable. Freezing rain and drizzle are the ultimate enemy that 
    can drastically roughen large surface areas or distort airfoil shapes and 
    make flight extremely dangerous or impossible in a matter of a few minutes. 
    Freezing rain occurs when precipitation from warmer air aloft falls through 
    a temperature inversion into below-freezing air underneath. The larger 
    droplets may impact and freeze behind the area protected by surface deicers. 
    Freezing drizzle is commonly formed when droplets collide and coalesce with 
    other droplets. As the droplets grow in size, they begin to fall as drizzle. 
    Both freezing rain and drizzle can fall below a cloud deck to the ground and 
    cause ice to form on aircraft surfaces during ground operations, takeoff, 
    and landing if the surface temperature is below freezing (Porter J. Perkins 
    and William J. Rieke, In-Flight Icing. Ohio, 1999). Along a cold front, the 
    cold air ploughs under the warm air, lifting it more rapidly and resulting 
    in the formation of moist cumulus. Along a warm front, the warmer air tends 
    to slide over the colder air, forming stratus clouds conducive to icing. As 
    you approach the front, the clouds build quickly and the clear air between 
    layers rapidly disappears. Freezing rain and freezing drizzle, including 
    freezing drizzle aloft, are sometimes found in the vicinity of fronts. If 
    you choose to fly through the front, be sure that it does not contain 
    freezing rain or freezing drizzle and other hazardous weather conditions 
    such as embedded thunderstorms. You should plan on flying the shortest route 
    through the front instead of flying the length of the front. 
     
    Structural Ice
 How quickly a surface collects ice depends in part on its shape. Thin, 
    modern wings will be more critical with ice on them than thick, older wing 
    sections. The tail surfaces of an airplane will normally ice up much faster 
    than the wing. If the tail stalls due to ice and the airflow disruption it 
    causes, recovery is unlikely at low altitudes. Several air carrier aircraft 
    have been lost due to tail stalls. It also happens to light aircraft but 
    usually isn't well documented. Since tail stall is less familiar to many 
    pilots, it is emphasized in this advisor, but wing stall is the much more 
    common threat, and it is very important to correctly distinguish between the 
    two, since the required actions are roughly opposite.
 
 Wing Stall
 
 The wing will ordinarily stall at a lower angle of attack, and thus a higher 
    airspeed, when contaminated with ice. Even small amounts of ice will have an 
    effect, and if the ice is rough, it can be a large effect. Thus an increase 
    in approach speed is advisable if ice remains on the wings. How much of an 
    increase depends on both the aircraft type and amount of ice. Consult your 
    AFM or POH. Stall characteristics of an aircraft with ice-contaminated wings 
    will be degraded, and serious roll control problems are not unusual. The ice 
    accretion may be asymmetric between the two wings. Also, the outer part of a 
    wing, which is ordinarily thinner and thus a better collector of ice, may 
    stall first rather than last.
 
 Effects of Icing on Roll Control
 
 Ice on the wings forward of the ailerons can affect roll control. Wings on 
    GA aircraft are designed so that stall starts near the root of the wing and 
    progresses outward, so the stall does not interfere with roll control of the 
    ailerons. However, the tips are usually thinner than the rest of the wing, 
    so they are the part of the wing that most efficiently collects ice. This 
    can lead to a partial stall of the wings at the tips, which can affect the 
    ailerons and thus roll control. If ice accumulates in a ridge aft of the 
    boots but forward of the ailerons, this can affect the airflow and interfere 
    with proper functioning of the ailerons. If aileron function is impaired due 
    to ice, slight forward pressure on the elevator may help to reattach airflow 
    to the aileron.
 
 What Is a Tail Stall?
 
 The horizontal stabilizer balances the tendency of the nose to pitch down by 
    generating downward lift on the tail of the aircraft. When the tail stalls, 
    this downward force is lessened or removed, and the nose of the airplane can 
    severely pitch down. Because the tail has a smaller leading edge radius and 
    chord length than the wings, it can collect proportionately two to three 
    times more ice than the wings and, often, the ice accumulation is not seen 
    by the pilot.
 
     
    Recognizing and Recovering from a Tail 
    Stall
 You are likely experiencing a tail stall if:
   
     
     When flaps are extended to 
     any setting, the pitchcontrol forces become abnormal or erratic.
    There is buffet in the 
    control column (not theairframe).
 Recovery from a tail stall is 
  exactly opposite the traditionally taught wing stall recovery. Remember, in a 
  tail stall recovery air flow must be restored to the tail's lower airfoil 
  surface, and in a wing stall recovery air flow must be restored to the wing's 
  upper airfoil surface.
 Here is how to recover from a tail stall:
 
   
   Immediately raise flaps to 
   the previous setting.
  Pull aft on the yoke. Copilot 
  assistance may be required.
Reduce power if altitude 
permits; otherwise maintain power.
Do not increase airspeed unless 
it is necessary to avoid a wing stall. 
Is Your Aircraft Approved?
 There are two kinds of aircraft—those that are FAA approved for flight in icing 
conditions and those that are not. Icing approval involves a rigorous testing 
program, and relatively few light aircraft carry this approval. From a legal 
perspective, aircraft that do not have all required ice protection equipment 
installed and functional are prohibited from venturing into an area where icing 
conditions are known. There are some legal issues beyond the scope of this 
publication regarding what constitutes "known" ice. We will focus on the 
operational and safety issues. Partial equipage, such as a heated propeller or 
windshield, does not prepare an aircraft for flight in icing conditions; it only 
makes the escape a little easier. Most light aircraft have only a heated pitot 
tube, and without full approval for flight in icing, their crosscountry 
capability in cooler climates during late fall, winter, and early spring is 
limited.
 
 In addition to the wings, other 
parts of the aircraft can ice up quickly. A completely blocked pitot tube due to 
an inoperative heater will cause the airspeed indicator to function like an 
altimeter. As the aircraft climbs, so does the airspeed. As the aircraft 
descends, so does the airspeed indication. A Boeing 727 crew neglected to turn 
on pitot anti-ice, stalled, and crashed the jet when they thought it was going 
into an overspeed condition because of the high indicated airspeed during 
climbout. 
 In certain icing conditions, 
control surfaces may bind or jam when the pilot really needs full control 
authority. Ice-approved aircraft have been tested with significant ice 
accumulations on all control surfaces to ensure no binding occurs. If you look 
closely at some approved aircraft, you will see space around the edges of 
control surfaces to allow ice to build up without interfering with their 
movement. Unheated fuel vents can become blocked, which may lead to fuel 
starvation. Fuel tanks, especially bladder types, may collapse because air is 
unavailable to replace the used fuel. The engine may stop. A number of accidents 
occurred when flights had successfully negotiated the en route phase and 
approach, but the pilot could not see ahead well enough to land through an 
iced-up windshield.  Invariably, the question comes 
up as to how much ice a particular non-approved aircraft can carry. The answer 
is, no one knows because it has never been tested. Without an approved icing 
package, you become the test pilot. We don't recommend betting your life on the 
local airport sage who may have been in ice a few times and is prepared to 
dispense all the free advice you're willing to gamble on. You and yourpassengers deserve better. The best course of action is to exit the icing 
condition immediately.
 
 Deicing and Anti-Icing Equipment
 
 Many aircraft have some, but not all, the gear required for approved flight into 
icing conditions. In some cases, the equipment has been added as an after-market 
modification. Although it may give the pilot more time to escape an icing 
encounter, it has not been tested in the full range of conditions and, 
therefore, does not change the aircraft's limitation prohibiting flight into 
icing. Plan to avoid icing conditions, but if you experience unexpected ice 
buildup, use the equipment to escape—do not depend on it for prolonged periods, 
particularly in moderate or heavier ice.
 Anti-icing is turned on 
before the flight enters icing conditions. Typically this includes carburettor 
heat, prop heat, pitot heat, fuel vent heat, windshield heat, and fluid surface 
deicers (in some cases).  Deicing is used after ice 
has built up to an appreciable amount. Typically this includes surface deice 
equipment.  Propeller Anti-icers: Ice 
often forms on the propeller before it is visible on the wing. Props are treated 
with deicing fluid applied by slinger rings on the prop hub or with electrically 
heated elements on the leading edges.  Wing Deicer, and Anti-icing 
Systems: There is presently one type of wing deicer—boots—and two anti-icing 
systems—weeping wing systems (fluid deice systems) and heated wings—that are 
commonly used in general aviation today. For the most part, general aviation 
aircraft equipped to fly in icing conditions use boots and, to a lesser extent, 
weeping wings. Hot wings are typically found on jets and will not be discussed 
in this publication. Any guidance given on flying in icing conditions is 
intended for aircraft that are certified for flight in known icing conditions. 
Non-certified aircraft MUST exit icing conditions IMMEDIATELY.  
 Boots are inflatable 
rubber strips attached to and conforming to the leading edge of the wing and 
tail surfaces. When activated, they are pressurized with air and they expand, 
breaking ice off the boot surfaces. Then suction is applied to the boots and 
they return to their original shape. A persistent myth holds that if the boots 
are cycled too soon after an icing encounter they may expand the ice layer 
instead of breaking it off. Then when the boots deflate, a “bridge” of ice 
remains that cannot be shed during the next inflation cycle. Although some 
residual ice may remain after a boot cycle, “bridging” does not occur with any 
modern boots.  
 Pilots can cycle the boots as 
soon as an ice accumulation is observed. Consult the POH for information on the 
operation of boots on your aircraft. 
 Weeping wing deicing systems 
pump fluid from a reservoir through a mesh screen embedded in the leading edges 
of the wings and tail. Activated by a switch in the cockpit, the liquid flows 
all over the wing and tail surfaces, deicing as it flows. It can also be applied 
to the prop and windshield. Windshield Anti-icers: 
Because being able to see for landing is critical, there are two systems used in 
light aircraft. An electrically heated windshield, or plate, or a fluid spray 
bar located just ahead of the pilot's windshield is used to prevent ice. Another 
method is the windshield defroster. This is never acceptable by itself on 
approved aircraft, but for the rest of us, it's the only source of ice 
prevention that may keep at least a small area of the windshield clear enough to 
peer through during an inadvertent icing encounter.  
 Carburettor Heat/Alternate 
Air: Carburettor heat is recommended for most carburetted engines when 
throttling back from cruise power and may be used during snow or rain and in 
clouds with near-freezing temperatures. The POH should be consulted for proper 
carburettor heat operation. Fuel-injected engines depend on airflow as well, and 
if the primary air intake ices, an alternate air door either opens automatically 
or is activated by the pilot to keep the engine running.
 “Ice Flying”: The Strategy
 
 Smart “ice flying” begins on the ground. For VFR flight operations, with the 
exceptions of freezing rain, freezing drizzle, and carburettor icing, staying 
clear of the clouds by a safe margin solves the icing problem. For pilots 
choosing to go IFR, it becomes more complicated. Use the many resources 
available to you: television, the Direct User Access Terminal (DUAT) system, 
flight service stations, AOPA Online, and Aviation Weather Centre's current 
icing potential (CIP). Continue to request pireps—and make some of your 
own—along your route if you suspect icing to be a potential problem. Ask the 
right questions, and remember that conditions that appear to be similar to 
weather you've dealt with before may be much different.
 Where are the fronts? 
Know the big picture because most ice is in fronts and low-pressure centres.
 Where are the fronts moving? 
Where will they be when I depart and when I arrive? Check "upstream" weather 
reports and trends. If the destination is Cincinnati, what's the weather in 
Indianapolis 100 miles to the northwest? Remember that forecasts are not 
guarantees and plan accordingly.  Where are the cloud tops? 
You cannot climb through a front with tops to 30,000 feet. For most light 
nonturbocharged aircraft, once the tops reach 8,000 feet, climbing is no longer 
an option. Once on top, can you stay on top? Expect much higher clouds over 
mountains.  Where are the cloud bases? 
Below the clouds where freezing rain or freezing drizzle is not present, there 
will be no structural icing. Where is the warm air? If 
the freezing level is high enough above the IFR minimum en route altitude (MEA), 
the flight may be feasible. However, air traffic control may not be able to 
guarantee you the MEA due to traffic or conflicts with other sectors. If it's 
freezing on the surface and the clouds are close to the surface and more than a 
few thousand feet thick, it is foolish to attempt to climb through to clear 
conditions on top.  Air mass clouds or frontal 
clouds? Know the difference between air mass clouds and frontal clouds. 
Frontal clouds are usually indicative of large areas of significant weather, so 
an aircraft flying through frontal clouds can be exposed to icing conditions for 
a longer period of time. Air mass clouds may have snowshowers but do not have 
large areas of steady snow. Unless you are flying in the mountains, steady snow 
or rain means significant weather is building. With the exceptions of freezing 
rain and freezing drizzle, the only way to gather structural ice is in an actual 
cloud. Flying in snow or between cloud layers will not cause structural ice, 
although wet snow may adhere to the aircraft.  What alternate routes are 
available? Flying the flatlands with lower MEAs is likely to provide much 
better weather, a smoother ride, and less ice than the same trip over the 
mountains. Detour if necessary. Avoid flying south through a front that is 200 
miles long when you could fly west and be through it in 35 miles.  What are the escape routes?
At any time during a flight where structural ice is a possibility, you need 
an alternate plan of action. That could be a climb, descent, 180-degree turn, or 
immediate landing at a nearby airport. It will depend on traffic, terrain, cloud 
conditions, visibility, and availability of suitable airports. Quickly tell ATC 
you are in ice and want out. Ask for a higher or lower altitude or a 180-degree 
turn. If ATC won't let you climb due to traffic, let them know that you are 
willing to accept a climb at any heading.  What pireps are available? 
Pay particular attention to pireps. Because icing is forecast for extremely 
broad areas, pireps may be the only information you’ll have as to where the ice 
is actually occurring. They tell you what the conditions really were at a 
particular time in a specific place. Think about whether those conditions are 
likely to be duplicated during your flight.  How will you handle it? 
What are your escape plans?
 Pireps are individual judgment calls, so having several for the same area will 
usually result in a better picture. Be prepared for surprises if you rely on 
just one pirep. The type of aircraft making the pirep is also critical. When 
jets or turboprops report moderate ice or worse, that’s a mandate for light 
aircraft to plan a different strategy immediately. Turbine-powered airplanes are 
equipped for flight into icing conditions and have much higher performance to 
punch through an icing layer quickly. A “light” ice report from turbine aircraft 
may mean moderate ice for you. How old is the pirep? Weather moves and changes, 
so a report more than 45 minutes old may be of limited use.
 
 The Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) defines how in-flight icing should be 
reported when filing a pirep:
 
 
 Trace: Ice becomes perceptible. 
 Rate of accumulation is slightly greater than the rate of sublimation. (Note: 
 The FAA has proposed the elimination of this definition, since even a small 
 accumulation may be hazardous depending on its roughness and location.) 
Light: The rate of accumulation 
may create a problem if flight is prolonged in this environment (over one hour). 
Occasional use of deicing/antiicing equipment removes/prevents accumulation. It 
does not present a problem if the deicing/anti-icing equipment is used.
Moderate: The rate of 
accumulation is such that even short encounters become potentially hazardous and 
use of deicing/anti-icing equipment or flight diversion is necessary.
Severe: The rate of accumulation 
is such that deicing/anti-icing equipment fails to reduce or control the hazard. 
An immediate flight diversion is necessary.  
“Ice Flying”: The Tactics
 (In-flight portions of this section are intended for aircraft that are certified 
for flight into known icing conditions. Non-certified aircraft must exit any 
icing conditions immediately.)
 
 
Preflight
 Carry extra fuel. In icing conditions, extra power is needed because of 
increased aerodynamic drag and/or because carburettor heat is used. Fuel 
consumption will increase.
 
 Other than extra fuel, keep the aircraft as light as possible. The more weight 
to carry, the slower the climb and the more time spent in ice. Remove all frost, 
snow, or ice from the wings. There is no point in starting the day with two 
strikes against you. Every winter there are "frostbitten" pilots who crash as a 
result of guessing how much frost their aircraft will carry. A perfectly clean 
wing is the only safe wing. Don't count on blowing snow off when taking off. 
There could be some nasty sticky stuff underneath the snow. If you think it's 
light enough to blow off, it should be very easy to brush off before starting. 
Do it!
 
 The propeller(s) must be dry and 
clean. Check the controls to be sure there is freedom of movement in all 
directions.  Check the landing gear (especially retractables) and clean off 
all accumulated slush. Wheelpants on fixed-gear aircraft should be removed in 
winter operations because they are slush collectors. Be sure to check wheel 
wells for ice accumulation. This is always a good idea after taxiing through 
slush. 
 Be sure that deice and anti-ice equipment works. When was the last time you 
actually checked the pitot heat for proper functioning?
 
 Taxying
 
 Taxi slowly on icy taxiways. The wind may become a limiting factor because the 
ability to steer and counteract weathervaning tendencies is poor. Tap the brakes 
lightly and briefly. Hard braking pressure will lock the wheels, resulting in a 
skid. If the runup area is slick, it may be impossible to run the engine up 
without sliding. It might be better to stop on the taxiway, leave room to slide, 
and watch where you're going. If there is a dry patch of pavement, stop there to 
do the runup. Make sure the wing tips and tail are clear of any snow piled up 
along the edge of the taxiways.
 
 Departure
 
 Know where the cloud bases and the tops are, and check for recent pireps. If you 
encounter icing conditions, have a plan either to return to the departure 
airport or climb above the ice. If you decide to return, be sure you can safely 
fly the approach in the existing weather conditions. In either case, advise ATC 
you will need clearance to proceed as soon as possible. If there is heavy 
traffic, there may be some delay. If you don't factor this into the plan, you 
are not prepared. You may want to cycle the landing gear after takeoff to help 
shed ice from the landing gear. During climb, even though you are anxious to get 
out of icing, do not climb too steeply because ice can form on the underside of 
the wing behind the boot. Remember that as the ice accumulates on the underside 
of the wing, drag increases, sometimes dramatically. Do not lose control of the 
aircraft.
 
 
En route
 Make pireps as you go and ask for them en route. Talk to ATC and flight service 
about any weather developments or forecast changes. All the cautions about 
pireps mentioned earlier apply here.
 
 Airspeed is a key to measuring ice accumulation. If normal cruise speed is 140 
KIAS and you notice the airspeed has dropped to 130 KIAS, it's time to exit 
immediately. If you can't climb or descend, then a 180-degree turn is the only 
option, and that will result in a loss of at least another 10 KIAS until you're 
out of the ice. A 20-knot drop in airspeed is plenty. Add power to increase 
airspeed, since stall speed margins shrink with speed loss. Speed discipline is 
essential in icing conditions. The lower the performance of the aircraft, the 
less airspeed loss can be tolerated. Remember, an aircraft not certified for 
flight into icing conditions should start working to get out of those conditions 
at the first sign of ice.
 
 At the first sign of ice accumulation, decide what action you need to take and 
advise ATC. Do you know where warmer air or a cloud-free altitude is? If you 
need to modify your route to avoid ice, be firm with ATC about the need to 
change altitude or direction as soon as possible. Don't wait until the situation 
deteriorates; start working with ATC early. If you need to declare an emergency 
to solve the problem, do it. This is a far better alternative than crashing.
 
Immediate - A Word to Live By 
 Pilots are invariably better judges of their flight environment than 
controllers, but sometimes pilots have difficulty expressing their predicament 
to ATC. We want to exit icing conditions as soon as possible, but ATC may delay 
our request for any number of reasons. Now there is a way, short of declaring an 
emergency, for pilots to get expeditious handling. Requesting an immediate 
climb, descent, or turn lets the controller know that unless the request is 
handled quickly an emergency situation will likely develop.
 If you're on top of a cloud 
layer and can stay on top, ask ATC for a climb well before getting into the 
clouds. Icing is much worse in the tops of the clouds. If you're in the clouds 
and the temperature is close to freezing, ask for a top report ahead. This tells 
you whether going up is a better option than descending. In a low-power 
aircraft, climbing through a 3,000- foot icing layer to get on top is chancy. If 
flying around mountains, be extra cautious. The air being lifted up the mountain 
slopes by the wind (called orographic lifting) is known to produce moderate to 
severe icing conditions.  Expect severe icing potential 
when flying over or when downwind of the Great Lakes and other large bodies of 
water. The air is extremely moist, and if the temperatures are freezing or 
below, the clouds can be loaded with ice.  
 Do not use the autopilot when in 
icing conditions. It masks the aerodynamic effects of the ice and may bring the 
aircraft into a stall or cause control problems. The situation can degrade to 
the point that autopilot servo control power is exceeded, disconnecting the 
autopilot. The pilot is then faced with an immediate control deflection for 
which there was no warning or preparation.  In 1994, an ATR 72 crashed in 
Roselawn, Indiana, during a rapid descent after an uncommanded roll excursion 
while on autopilot. The airplane was in a holding pattern in freezing drizzle 
and was descending to a newly assigned altitude. The NTSB determined that one of 
the probable causes of this accident was “loss of control, attributed to a 
sudden and unexpected aileron hinge moment reversal that occurred after a ridge 
of ice accreted beyond the deice boots… Had ice accumulated on the wing leading 
edges so as to burden the ice protection system, or if the crew had been able to 
observe the ridge of ice building behind the deice boots… It is probable that 
the crew would have exited the conditions.” A contributing factor was the lack 
of information in the flight manual about autopilot operation during such 
conditions. 
Approach and Landing
 Most icing accidents occur in the approach and landing phases of flight. If on 
top of ice-laden clouds, request ATC's permission to stay on top as long as 
possible before having to descend. When carrying ice do not lower the flaps. The 
airflow change resulting from lowering the flaps may cause a tail with ice 
accretion to stall. Remember the stall speed is increased when carrying a load 
of ice, and the stall margin is reduced when you slow to land. If the aircraft 
is iced up, carry extra power and speed on final approach—at least 10 to 20 
knots more speed than usual. Do not use full flaps when carrying this extra 
speed, or a tail stall may occur. Remember, speed discipline is essential in 
icing conditions. Most icing accidents occur when the aircraft is manoeuvring to 
land. Be very cautious of turns. The stall potential is high.
 
 If you have a choice of airports, use the longest runway possible, even if it 
means renting a car to get home. A 3,000-foot strip is not the place to go when 
carrying ice, even though it might be twice the runway you normally use. Because 
of increased airspeed and a no-flap configuration, the landing distance will be 
much longer than normal. If there is ice aloft, frequently there may be ice on 
the runway as well, which greatly increases stopping distance. If you are 
unfortunate enough to have an inadvertent icing encounter in an aircraft without 
windshield anti-ice, turn the defroster on high to possibly keep a portion of 
the windshield clear. Turn off the cabin heat if that will provide more heat to 
the windshield.
 
 If the windshield is badly iced, open the side window and attempt to scrape away 
a small hole using an automotive windshield ice scraper, credit card, or other 
suitable object. You may damage the windshield, but the alternative could be 
much worse. Do not lose control of the aircraft when removing ice from the 
windshield.
 
 
Induction System Ice
 Not all aircraft ice is structural; induction icing is the cause of many 
accidents. There are two kinds of induction system icing: carburettor icing, 
which affects engines with carburettors, and air intake blockage, which affects 
both carburetted and fuel injected engines. Induction icing accidents top the 
charts as the number one cause of icing accidents, comprising a whopping 52 
percent.
 
 Unless preventive or corrective measures are taken, carburettor icing can cause 
complete power failure. In a normally aspirated engine, the carburetion process 
can lower the temperature of the incoming air as much as 60 degrees Fahrenheit. 
If the moisture content is high enough, ice will form on the throttle plate and 
venturi, gradually shutting off the supply of air to the engine. Even a small 
amount of carburettor ice will result in a power loss, indicated by reduced rpm 
with a fixed-pitch propeller and a loss of manifold pressure with a constant 
speed propeller, and may make the engine run rough.
 
 It is possible for carburettor 
ice to form even when the skies are clear and the outside air temperature is as 
high as 90 degrees Fahrenheit, if the relative humidity is 50 percent or more 
particularly when engine rpm is low. This is why, when flying most airplanes 
with carburetted engines, students are drilled to turn on the carburettor heat 
before making a significant power reduction. Carburettors can, however, ice up 
at cruise power when flying in clear air and in clouds. The envelope for the 
most severe buildups of carburettor ice is between 60 and 100 percent relative 
humidity and 20 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit.
 At the first indication of carburettor ice, apply full carburettor heat and 
LEAVE IT ON. The engine may run rougher as the ice melts and goes through it, 
but it will smooth out again. When the engine runs smoothly, turn off the heat. 
(If you shut off the carburettor heat prematurely, the engine will build more 
ice—and probably quit because of air starvation.)
 
 The engine rpm should return to its original power setting. If the rpm drops 
again, fly with the carb heat on. Do not use partial heat. With carburettor heat 
on, the hot air is less dense, so the mixture becomes richer, and as a result, 
the rpm will drop a bit further. Lean the mixture, and most of the rpm loss 
should return. If you don't lean, fuel consumption increases. A number of fuel 
exhaustion accidents have resulted from miscalculations.
 
 If carburettor heat is used for landing and you decide to go around, advance the 
throttle smoothly, then remove the carb heat. This will ensure all available 
power for takeoff.
 
 Fuel-injected engines have no carburettor and, therefore, no carburettor ice 
problem. However, when conditions are favourable for structural ice, 
fuelinjected engines can lose power and even fail if the air filter and intake 
passages are blocked by ice. (This can also occur in airplanes with 
carburettors.) At the first sign of power loss, activate the alternate induction 
air door or doors. When these doors open, intake air routes through them, 
bypassing the iceblocked normal induction air pathway. Many alternate induction 
air systems activate automatically; these designs use spring-loaded doors. 
Suction in an ice-blocked air intake draws these alternate air doors open. Some 
older fuel-injected airplanes have alternate air doors that must be manually 
opened. Knobs or levers have to be physically moved to the open position in 
order for alternate air to reach the engine.
 
 Check the POH for your airplane to find out how and when to use this system. 
Note: Both carburettor heat and alternate air sources use unfiltered air. They 
should be closed when on the ground, unless conditions are conducive to engine 
icing while taxiing.
 
Just a Little Iceby Jim Schlick, CFI and retired B-52 radar navigator
 
 The following story shows why a non-certified aircraft MUST exit icing 
conditions immediately if they are inadvertently encountered. The pilot delayed 
in exiting the icing conditions, and in just a couple of minutes disaster almost 
resulted.)
 
 This story began as an attempt to get some actual IMC for an aspiring instrument 
pilot. He would fly; I would file IFR and instruct. We had a well-equipped C-172 
with the 180-horsepower conversion available. The weather and our schedules 
matched on Saturday, November 8. Conditions seemed ideal. There was warm, moist 
air over most of Minnesota, with a southerly flow and widespread low-overcast 
conditions. A slow-moving cold front lay across north-western Minnesota and was 
forecast to reach the St. Cloud area that evening. We departed at 10 a.m. on a 
flight from St. Cloud to Duluth, planning to complete the return leg before 3 
p.m. That Saturday morning, St. Cloud, Duluth, and all en route reporting 
stations had surface temperatures of 35 to 38 degrees Fahrenheit. Sky conditions 
were overcast at 600 to 1,000 feet. Visibility below the overcast was four to 
six miles in mist and haze. Winds aloft were out of the southwest, and forecast 
freezing levels were 6,000 feet. We had two pireps that indicated the cloud deck 
along our route was about 2,000 feet thick with no mention of icing.
 The only icing forecast was 
along the cold front in north-western Minnesota. We picked up an IFR clearance 
to 4,000 feet and departed. The instrument student climbed through the overcast 
at St. Cloud. Because we were IMC, we had the pitot heat on. I watched the 
outside temperature; it held at 35 degrees through the climb. There was moisture 
in the clouds; water beads were forming and rolling back off the Skyhawk's wing 
strut. Levelling at 4,000 put us 200 feet above the tops in brilliant sunshine. 
The temperature read 38 degrees. Our clearance was St. Cloud-Mora-Duluth, and we 
planned to do an en route NDB approach at Mora. The NDB is on the field. The 
distance from St. Cloud to Mora is less than 40 nautical miles. After enjoying 
the sunshine for a few minutes, we requested the NDB at Mora from Centre. The 
controller gave us 3,000 feet. As we levelled at 3,000, 15 nm southwest of Mora, 
we were cleared for the approach. Mora's ASOS was reporting 800 overcast, five 
miles in haze, and 36 degrees. Our loran was giving us distance information to 
the NDB. A couple of minutes after levelling at 3,000, I noticed a trace of rime 
ice forming on the leading edges.  I was surprised because this was 
not forecast, and we had climbed through the overcast 20 miles back with no 
problems. I was a little complacent.  Though the temperature here was 
32 degrees, I knew this deck was just 2,000 feet thick, and there was warmer air 
above and below. I was still hoping to complete the practice approach. As we 
neared the NDB, still at 3,000, I realized the ice was building and that we had 
to leave that air mass. I told Centre we were going missed approach and 
requested 5,000 feet direct Duluth. As soon as Centre answered with the 
clearance, we started climbing and pulled the control for alternate static air. 
During this time, the rate of ice buildup increased significantly. Ice ridges 
formed on the windshield, and the protrusions on the leading edges grew rapidly. 
Then, I realized the aircraft had levelled at 3,500 feet. 
 The aircraft had full power, was flying at 70 knots, and was unable to climb. 
Incredulous, I said I would take the airplane and climb the last 300 feet to 
clear air. As I took the airplane, I increased the angle of attack slightly. 
Shortly thereafter, I began having trouble with roll control. Still IMC, the 
attitude indicator showed a constant left bank of 20 to 25 degrees. The rudder 
yawed the airplane, but would not lift the wing. Ailerons did not lift the wing. 
I suspected an attitude indicator failure. Then I realized the heading indicator 
was rotating in a constant left turn. The turn coordinator also showed a left 
bank. It had to be true. We were indeed flying 65 to 70 knots in a constant left 
bank, level at 3,500 feet, too iced up to control the bank at that airspeed. It 
was clear we could not climb out.
 
 I lowered the nose and headed for the NDB. Unsure of our instruments, I asked 
the other pilot to continuously read out the aircraft heading from the compass 
while I turned to the bearings shown on the ADF and loran. I told Centre we had 
encountered some ice and were flying the NDB 35 at Mora to a full stop. We 
crossed the NDB at 2,800 feet. In descending flight, we had control and the 
instruments worked fine. However, ice was still forming. I flew outbound for the 
procedure turn and let the aircraft continue to settle. When the other pilot 
called one minute south of the NDB, we were at 2,500 feet (300 feet below the 
published altitude for the procedure turn), and I noticed water streaming up the 
windshield. I added power, held altitude, flew a tight procedure turn, and 
descended to the NDB.
 We broke out at 800 feet agl as 
expected. I gave the airplane to the other pilot, who circled the field and 
landed smoothly without flaps at 80 knots. While he circled, I noticed the 
chunks of ice being carried away by the slipstream. On the ground, we saw 
horn-shaped ice formations on all the leading edges. Ice covered the centre of 
the leading edges, then ballooned into an ice ridge three times the thickness of 
the attached section. To me, it looked like a large, three-sided engineering 
ruler attached to the leading edge of the wing at one of the three points. We 
called Flight Service to close our flight plan and give them our icing pirep.
 Over a cup of coffee, we discussed the lessons learned. The time from the first 
trace to the decision to climb out was about five minutes. From that decision to 
the point where the aircraft stopped climbing was, perhaps, another four 
minutes. The rate of buildup was many times higher during the last minutes of 
the encounter. We reflected on the danger incurred when the aircraft went into 
an uncontrolled left bank during the attempted climbout. At that point, we both 
suspected instrument failure. Being IMC, it took all our combined skill to 
interpret the situation and realize that we had to increase airspeed, which 
required a descent. Without pitot heat, we would not have had the airspeed 
indicator. Could we have maintained control without airspeed? How close to the 
stall did we get? The actual stall speed was anybody's guess. We decided the 
aircraft went into a bank because the ailerons lost effectiveness. With ice 
masking the ailerons and substantially increased drag on the wings, those 
control surfaces would no longer overcome the aircraft's left-turning tendencies 
at slow speed. The rudder was effective throughout this scenario. From 
practicing slow flight, we knew that at minimum controllable airspeeds, the 
rudder is more effective than ailerons.
 
 It would have been a very dangerous approach if the icing conditions had 
continued to the surface. Throughout the scenario, it was reassuring to have the 
current ASOS and know we would break out in warmer air. The landing was not 
difficult, as we had forward visibility and a long runway to accommodate the 
required high-speed touchdown. I will never again doubt that ice can form very 
quickly. I also know that a moderate amount of ice will prevent a small airplane 
from climbing and will impact slow-speed flight characteristics. I was reminded, 
again, that complacency is a dangerous flight mate—thinking about the warmer air 
above and below made me complacent enough to stay in the icing conditions until 
getting out required unnecessary and dangerous risks.
 
 
 |