|  manoeuvring speed
 One of the most commonly 
      stated definitions of the Manoeuvring speed, is the speed at which 
      the pilot can use full control deflections without over-stressing the 
      airplane. The above definition is reasonably correct, although it 
      should be limited to "full nose up control deflections" without 
      over-stressing the airplane. This definition however does not give us the 
      insight we need to create an equation which will give us the Manoeuvring 
      speed of our airplane. To do that we need to consider why there is a speed 
      below which it is impossible to overstress the airplane.  
       In the diagram to the 
      right the maximum lift the wing can produce is shown in red. The LF=1 line 
      shows the stall speed, as we learned in the previous section. The LF=n 
      (n=3.8) line shows the minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift 
      equal to the design Load Factor. This is the definition of Manoeuvring 
      speed we need. The Manoeuvring Speed is the 
      minimum speed at which the wing can produce lift equal to the design load 
      limit. Below this speed the wing can not produce enough lift to 
      overstress the aircraft, no matter what angle of attack is used. 
       The design load limit is specified by the 
      FAA for USA designed aircraft and Transport Canada for Canadian designed 
      aircraft. In Module 5 we will explore all the aircraft limitations 
      required by law.  For most normal aircraft the design load 
      limit is 3.8g.  
 Manoeuvring Speed FormulaIt is obvious that the Manoeuvring speed 
      is closely related to the stall speed. We could in fact create a formula 
      for Manoeuvring speed which is identical to the stall speed equation 
      except with lift equal to n times the weight:  
        This equation is virtually identical to 
      the Stall speed equation:  
        The only difference is that the 
      Manoeuvring speed depends upon the square root of nW not just the square 
      root of W. Therefore we can express Va in terms of Vs as:  
        
        |